Articles

Is the climate fight a battle for system change or a business idea?

NVE: Wind turbine projects in Norway

By Ingrid Fiskaa,
leader Rogaland, and member of the program committee in SV

My climate anxiety had a preliminary peak during the drought summer two years ago. I lay awake all too hot nights and feared devastating fires. The dry lawn was a constant reminder that something is wrong. A few seconds’ lacks of bird chirps or an unexpected flower – which is not usually there – could make me think that the end is near. This summer I have felt a similar feeling: Naturegrief. I have been to several of the nature areas where the demolition is underway or has received approval. I have met people who live there, who know the paths and know where the hubro nests, and who use the area daily – to relax, recover, get their thoughts on the right track. Now it will be replaced by wide construction roads and parking spaces on at least half a football field per wind turbine.

The wind power development takes up enormous areas and takes place at a violent pace. Made possible by processes in which neither local knowledge nor professional advice is listened to. The state shows its ugliest face, as a means of power for big business, and tramples local communities under its heel. But what is most jarring is that it is happening in the name of the climate fight. How did we end up here? Naomi Klein points in the book On fire to an important explanation: Bad luck with political conditions. Climate change came on the political agenda at the worst possible time. The climate crisis is a challenge that requires joint action and political control. But in the late 1980s, neoliberalism was on the rise; capitalism was predominant as an economic system and man was to realize himself through consumption.

The most common explanations for why global warming has persisted, despite solid knowledge of causes and effects, are about stubborn people.

Man and nature are reduced to means of achieving profit

We do not want to give up our prosperity, and we do not want to vote for a party that wants to reduce emissions. The election periods are too short for the elected representatives to be able to do anything before they again face the people’s judgment. It is a narrative that omits the most important thing: capitalism. So we stick to an economic system with built-in coercion for growth, where ownership and power are concentrated in a few hands, and where man and nature are reduced to means of achieving profit for these few. When climate emissions increase, it is because this minority has too much power, and puts short-term economic gain above all else. Not because man as a species is too stupid.

After a while, smart capitalists have realized that the climate crisis is also a threat to themselves. The logical thing is to take a stand against the system and the power relations that create the problem. Instead, we must be convinced that it is enough to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy, and otherwise, continue as before. To achieve this, a theoretical distinction must be made between climate and nature, where climate measures are paramount to other considerations. This way of thinking is also found in the environmental movement and on the left. The urgency argument is used to justify solutions that one would otherwise be against, whether it is a reduction of nature or anti-social taxes. The problem with such a strategy is that it weakens the climate fight. It turns the focus and forces away from the causes of the climate crisis, and it creates counterforces among people who are exposed to this “green shift”. One thing is to be harassed by the undisguised greedy. It’s even worse when they claim to want to save the world. Both climate anxiety and nature grief are feelings we should take seriously, and a political strategy that isolates the climate from everything else is both stupid and dangerous.

41 Comments

  1. Pingback: The Green Scam - Bergensia

  2. Pingback: A socialist or a liberal energy sector? - Bergensia

  3. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine withdrawal side effects

  4. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine use by country

  5. Pingback: cost of hydroxychloroquine pill

  6. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine stock

  7. Pingback: ivermectine 6 mg

  8. Pingback: dapoxetine priligy usa

  9. Pingback: doctor prescribed stromectol for bv

  10. Pingback: plaquenil 6 for malaria prophylaxis

  11. Pingback: rayos 20 capsule

  12. Pingback: stromectol for swollen gums

  13. Pingback: stromectol for chickens

  14. Pingback: teva stromectol

  15. Pingback: is ivermectin poison

  16. Pingback: ivermectin prescription

  17. Pingback: The World's Sustainable Gazette - Bergensia

  18. Pingback: ivermectin for sale for humans

  19. Pingback: ivermectina

  20. Pingback: ivermectin and pinworms

  21. Pingback: ivermectin tablets for head lice

  22. Pingback: how ivermectin works for corona

  23. Pingback: sildenafil 25 mg tablet

  24. Pingback: viagra prescription uk

  25. Pingback: trump lowering cost of pharmaceuticals

  26. Pingback: how to get cialis prescription in canada

  27. Pingback: plaquenil for sale canada

  28. Pingback: can i purchase viagra over the counter in canada

  29. Pingback: stromectol sale canada

  30. Pingback: generic tadalafil mexico

  31. Pingback: can you buy generic viagra over the counter

  32. Pingback: Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy - Bergensia

  33. Pingback: Why can't we just set a fixed, low price on electricity? - Bergensia

  34. Pingback: Bergensia just passed a 1000 articles - Bergensia

  35. Pingback: calm harp music

  36. Pingback: bossa jazz cafe

  37. Pingback: สล็อตแตกง่ายสล็อตเว็บตรงสล็อตpg

  38. Pingback: เพิ่มยอดวิว

  39. Pingback: แทงหวย LSM99

  40. Pingback: ฟอกไตสมุทรสาคร

  41. Pingback: phim co trang

Send this to a friend