SDG16 - Peace and Justice Strong Institutions

US Election: Choose red or blue they both support the Chosen People of Israel’s Genocide on Palestine and Lebanon for the good of Greater Israel

Netanyahu holds up a map at the United Nations that has expunged Gaza and the West Bank, leaving just Israel. But people saying ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ are the problem, right?

Israeli media tells it like it is, whereas Western media is afraid; Netanyahu and his team are destroying Israel, with criminals in charge of finance, justice, and war, all led by a self-serving Prime Minister. Israeli writer Yossi Verter, Haaretz

October 7. Hannibal’s directive and Netanyahu’s fatherland

The Hannibal Directive (Hebrew: נוהל חניבעל, romanizedNóhal Khanibaál), also translated as Hannibal Procedure or Hannibal Protocol, is the name of a controversial procedure used by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces. According to one version, it says that “the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces.”[2] It was introduced in 1986, after a number of abductions of IDF soldiers in Lebanon and subsequent controversial prisoner exchanges. The full text of the directive was never published, and until 2003, Israeli military censorship forbade any discussion of the subject in the press. The directive has been changed several times,[2] and in 2016 Gadi Eizenkot ordered the formal revocation of the standing directive and the reformulation of the protocol.[3][4]

Israeli newspapers, including HaaretzABC News, and the UN’s Commission of Inquiry, have pointed out that during the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel, the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used. The IDF was ordered to prevent “at all costs” the abduction of Israeli civilians or soldiers, possibly leading to the death of a large number of Israeli hostages.[6][7][8][9][10][11]

When Netanyahu returns to Poland and becomes the president there, then he can speak of self-defense. As long as Mr Mileikowsky is in Palestine, he is an occupier who pretends to be a Semite, and a delusional supremacist who acts like this would give him carte blanche. Richard Medhurst

Some Zionists and their respective fatherland – no Semitic bloodline to the Holy Land, it seems:

Mr Mileikowsky’s clairvoyance

 

To a Zionist, every non-Jew is either Amalek or goy, and even fellow Jews who do not share the Zionist Ideology can be labeled anti-semitic.

Benjamin Netanyahu has said that the Israeli government was “committed to completely eliminating this evil from the world,” and he also stated: “You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible. And we do remember”.[110] At an argument to the International Court of Justice about allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on GazaSouth Africa presented the comments as inciting genocide against the Palestinian people. Netanyahu denied that was his intention, stating the South African accusation reflected a “deep historical ignorance” since he was referring to Hamas, not Palestinians as a whole.[111][112]

Nahma Nadich, deputy director of the Jewish Community Relations of Greater Boston writes:

I definitely see goy as a slur — seldom used as a compliment, and never used in the presence of a non-Jew.

adding[27]

That’s a good litmus test: if you wouldn’t use a word in the presence of someone you’re describing, [there is a] good chance it’s offensive.

This Drawing is Ten Years Old!

Comments are closed.

Send this to a friend